Question

Two answers required. Dagfinn Føllesdal analogized Husserl’s “noema” and “noesis” to these two concepts. A 1986 book by Nathan Salmon opposes the distinction between these two concepts and defends a Millian “naïve” theory. A paper distinguishes these two concepts, which are held to literally exist in a “third realm,” by imagining Daphnis holding two beliefs that are not salva veritate interchangeable. Ernst Tugendhat argued that a philosopher’s distinction between these two concepts (-5[1])was presaged by his (*) “context principle”; that thinker claimed these (10[1])concepts differ between “modes of presentation.” (10[1])Intensional and extensional logics are concerned with these two concepts. One of these concepts is the object picked out by a (10[1])proposition while the other (10[1])is the thought expressed by it, as shown by the sentence (-5[1])“the morning star is the evening star.” For 10 points, what two concepts title a paper by Gottlob Frege? ■END■ (10[2])

ANSWER: sense AND reference [or sinn AND bedeutung; accept referent, denotation, significance, or nominatum in place of “reference”; prompt on meaning in place of either; prompt on intension AND extension until “intensional”]
<FW, Philosophy (19th/20th Century)>
= Average correct buzz position

Back to tossups