Question

A 1996 book by David Cummiskey develops a Kantian framework named for these things. The essay “War and Murder” argues that a distinction between two kinds of these things is rooted in “Cartesian psychology,” which requires “making a little speech to yourself: ‘What I mean to be doing is…’” A contrived objection to an idea named for these things considers a fat man who is stuck in the mouth of a cave in which (-5[1])floodwaters (-5[1])are rising, while a group trapped inside has some dynamite. Every English philosopher after (*) Sidgwick has rejected the “intent-foresight” (10[1])distinction of these things according to Anscombe’s “Modern Moral Philosophy,” which first described an “-ism” named for them. (10[1])The trolley problem was introduced in a Philippa Foot paper titled for Aquinas’ doctrine of the “double” one of these things. For 10 points, (10[1])what things name an approach exemplified by utilitarianism? (10[1])■END■

ANSWER: consequences [or effects; accept other synonyms like the outcomes of an action; accept consequentialism; accept the doctrine of double effect; accept Kantian Consequentialism]
<FW, Philosophy (19th/20th Century)>
= Average correct buzz position

Back to tossups